In the following statement, Benjamin also claims“The painter maintains in his work a natural distance from reality, the cameraman penetrates deeply into its web. There is a tremendous difference between the pictures they obtain. That of the painter is a total one, that of the cameraman consists of multiple fragments which are assembled under a new law. Thus, for contemporary man the representation of reality by the film is incomparably more significant than that of the painter, since it offers, precisely because of the thoroughgoing permeation of reality with mechanical equipment, an aspect of reality which is free of all equipment. And that is what one is entitled to ask from a work of art.” Blair Witch alleges to be dealing with reality and the editing is therefore nonexistent, since we are supposedly watching a piece of film that was found in the woods and presented as it was shot. For that matter, there is no equipment, no fancy machinery that would increase the quality of the images, there is only "reality". The fact that the viewer believes to be watching a piece of amateur film, makes it even more real, as if he or she was in the forest in that terrifying situation, totally disengaged and unaware of any equipment.
Criticizing Media and The Media.
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Benjamin and The Blair Witch
In the following statement, Benjamin also claims“The painter maintains in his work a natural distance from reality, the cameraman penetrates deeply into its web. There is a tremendous difference between the pictures they obtain. That of the painter is a total one, that of the cameraman consists of multiple fragments which are assembled under a new law. Thus, for contemporary man the representation of reality by the film is incomparably more significant than that of the painter, since it offers, precisely because of the thoroughgoing permeation of reality with mechanical equipment, an aspect of reality which is free of all equipment. And that is what one is entitled to ask from a work of art.” Blair Witch alleges to be dealing with reality and the editing is therefore nonexistent, since we are supposedly watching a piece of film that was found in the woods and presented as it was shot. For that matter, there is no equipment, no fancy machinery that would increase the quality of the images, there is only "reality". The fact that the viewer believes to be watching a piece of amateur film, makes it even more real, as if he or she was in the forest in that terrifying situation, totally disengaged and unaware of any equipment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(9)
-
▼
December
(8)
- Benjamin and The Blair Witch
- Myth in Iraq
- Ghosts of Rwanda in The Public Sphere
- What would Fredric Jameson say about the Simpsons'...
- “Rhetoric of the Image" and The Sopranos Ad
- Tokyo Story and a classical Hollywood continuity f...
- Indian Children Sings a Song from The Wizard of Oz...
- How would Stuart Hall respond to the question: How...
-
▼
December
(8)
About Me
- Vinicius Bittencourt
- A film student who is trying his best to do well on the Media Criticism class.
No comments:
Post a Comment